From my perspective, access to basic healthcare is a fundamental human right, and I firmly believe that governments should ensure it is available to all citizens regardless of their financial situation. In countries with universal healthcare systems, such as the United Kingdom and Canada, people can receive treatment without the fear of crippling medical debt, which I think is how a civilised society should function. On the other hand, providing free healthcare on a large scale is enormously expensive, and funding it requires significant taxation. Having said that, I would argue that the long-term benefits far outweigh the costs. When people have access to preventive care and early diagnosis, it actually reduces the burden on the healthcare system overall because conditions are treated before they become severe and costly. Furthermore, a healthy population is a more productive population, which benefits the economy as a whole. I do acknowledge that pharmaceutical companies and medical professionals need fair compensation, so the system must be carefully designed to balance accessibility with quality. Ultimately, I believe healthcare should not be a luxury that only the wealthy can afford.
For opinion-based questions on social policy, take a clear stance but acknowledge the counterarguments. Using phrases like 'I firmly believe' shows conviction, while 'I do acknowledge that...' demonstrates you can consider opposing views. This balanced assertiveness is characteristic of Band 7-8 speaking.
Practice This Question
Record your answer and get instant AI feedback with per-word pronunciation scoring.
Practice Speaking